Energy Coach Online

• Dialogue is collaborative: two or more sides work together toward common understanding.
  • Debate is oppositional: two sides oppose each other and attempt to prove each other wrong.

• In dialogue, finding common ground is the goal.
  • In debate, winning is the goal.

• In dialogue, one listens to the other side(s) in order to understand, find meaning and find agreement.
  • In debate, one listens to the other side in order to find flaws and to counter its arguments.

• Dialogue enlarges and possibly changes a participants point of view.
  • Debate affirms a participant’s own point of view.

• Dialogue reveals assumptions for re-evaluation.
  • Debate defends assumptions as truth.

• Dialogue causes introspection on ones own position.
  • Debate causes critique of the other position.

• Dialogue opens the possibility of reaching a better solution than any of the original solutions.
  • Debate defends one’s own positions as the best solution and excludes other solutions.

• Dialogue creates an open-minded attitude: an openness to being wrong and an openness to change.
  • Debate creates a close-minded attitude, a determination to be right.

• In dialogue, one submits ones best thinking, knowing that other people’s reflections will help improve it rather than destroy it.
  • In debate, one submits one’s best thinking and defends it against challenge to show that it is right.

• Dialogue calls for temporarily suspending one’s beliefs.
  • Debate calls for investing wholeheartedly in one’s beliefs.

• In dialogue, one searches for basic agreements.
  • In debate, one searches for glaring differences.

• In dialogue one searches for strengths in the other positions.
  • In debate one searches for flaws and weaknesses in the other position.

• Dialogue involves a real concern for the other person and seeks to not alienate or offend.
  • Debate involves a countering of the other position without focusing on feelings or relationship and often belittles or deprecates the other person.

• Dialogue assumes that many people have pieces of the answer and that together they can put them into a workable solution.
  • Debate assumes that there is a right answer and that someone has it.

• Dialogue remains open-ended.
  • Debate implies a conclusion.

Adapted from a paper prepared by Shelley Berman, which was based on discussions of the Dialogue Group of the Boston Chapter of Educators for Social Responsibility (ESR).

No comments »

The Tele – seminar Series has started already and is about half way done, but there some amazing speakers are still

Jennifer McLean is the wonderful, funny, authentic and shift reading host of  this 12-week intensive that gives you exclusive inside-their-mind access to 24 of the world’s leading experts in new thought and wellness .

These well known speakers are revealing their most personal, private and above all most effective techniques that will help you achieve whatever you want in life (and release whatever you don’t want!).

Jennifer is an acclaimed healer, author and speaker who is applying her own process to this program, as evidenced by the list of “who’s who” in New Thought participating. Obviously, she knows how to make things happen and is very passionate about helping others achieve health and success.

There is still time to register for the free calls http://www.healingwiththemasters.com. You really don’t want to miss the rest of her speakers as Jennifer makes come the best out of them.

Enjoy, I do !

No comments »